> I agree with Mirja - this isn't v4 of the RFC Editor model; it's v3 > clarified. I'm agnostic whether we should obsolete and replace RFC 9280, or > simply patch it (i.e., "update"). If the document editors can make the > patching easier to read, that would help.
I think we should progress this draft and then just before WGLC-equivalent, merge it into 9280 and publish a full document. Having gone through a similar exercise for 2026 and 2418, I can testify that it does a real disservice to the community if things aren't written down, completely, in one place. -- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
