The authors have asked the RSWG to adopt this I-D. The Internet-Draft is here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-rfc9280-updates/
Since the agreement is to produce a complete replacement for RFC 9280 at the end of the discussion of updates, the document, if adopted, will become draft-rswg-rfc9280bis. Please voice your support or concerns for the RSWG adoption of this document by 28 February 2025. For the RSWG Co-chairs, Russ > On Feb 12, 2025, at 3:19 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > > Alexis and I have updated draft-hoffman-rfc9280-updates again to reflect the > WG discussion from last week. Please see: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-rfc9280-updates/ > The diffs can be found at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-hoffman-rfc9280-updates-02 > > We heard positive comments on this becoming a WG draft (that still needs > work). RSWG chairs: can you please start a call for adoption of this draft? > > --Paul and Alexis -- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
