also support

> On Feb 13, 2025, at 2:46 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Support.
> 
> Regards
>   Brian Carpenter
> 
> On 14-Feb-25 08:01, Russ Housley wrote:
>> The authors have asked the RSWG to adopt this I-D.
>> The Internet-Draft is here: 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-rfc9280-updates/
>> Since the agreement is to produce a complete replacement for RFC 9280 at the 
>> end of the discussion of updates, the document, if adopted, will become 
>> draft-rswg-rfc9280bis.
>> Please voice your support or concerns for the RSWG adoption of this document 
>> by 28 February 2025.
>> For the RSWG Co-chairs,
>> Russ
>>> On Feb 12, 2025, at 3:19 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Alexis and I have updated draft-hoffman-rfc9280-updates again to reflect 
>>> the WG discussion from last week. Please see:
>>>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hoffman-rfc9280-updates/
>>> The diffs can be found at:
>>>   https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-hoffman-rfc9280-updates-02
>>> 
>>> We heard positive comments on this becoming a WG draft (that still needs 
>>> work). RSWG chairs: can you please start a call for adoption of this draft?
>>> 
>>> --Paul and Alexis
> -- 
> rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org

-- 
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to