Martin, to simplify things and get them moving again, I propose the following:
On 16.02.2025 23:13, Martin Thomson wrote:
1. Updates based on RFC 9720 publication a. allow reissuance of RFCs (without "substantive" change) b. add desire to maintain series consistency c. rely on citation of 9720 rather than reproducing all of it
In scope.
2. More clearly allow the details of how policies are implemented to be developed outside of RSWG process (i.e., setting editorial policy, defining rfcxml formats, setting guidelines for documents, maintaining tools for developing documents)
In scope.
3. Define appeals path for decisions made in setting of detailed policy or its implication (e.g., disputes over interpretation for specific documents)
In scope.
4. Define "consumers" for RFCs as stakeholders and assign the RPC a role in representing their interests
NOT in scope (this time around). Eliot
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
