On 21-Feb-25 09:22, Eliot Lear wrote:
On 20.02.2025 21:15, Eric Rescorla wrote:
then it should be OK to strike that part of 3.2 (basically the last graf).
yes, that. The rest of the text is okay.
Thanks. I agree that the last paragraph is a stretch.
Brian
-Ekr
FWIW I think we should include it.
Regards
Brian
On 20-Feb-25 20:12, Eliot Lear wrote:
> Hi Brian
>
> On 20.02.2025 03:22, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>>
>>> NOT in scope (this time around).
>>
>> What do you mean by "this time around"? You mean the next version of
this draft, or something longer term?
>>
>> I think Jay has already implied that the scanty mention of consumers in
9280 is a loose end, and I wouldn't want 9280bis to leave the RPC unsure of what to
do about the loose end.
>>
> Why? What work is blocked because of that?
>
> Eliot
>
--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
