On Wed, May 28, 2025 at 1:56 PM Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is ready except for one question and two nits:
>
> Question. We state that SVGs must remain static after publication. Does
> that also intend to forbid animation? I have no experience with animated
> SVG, but Google tells me that it's possible, although somehwat
> browser-dependent. In any case, the draft should be clear about whether the
> word "static" is intended to forbid animation.
>
I am also confused. The text in question states:
* SVGs must remain static after publication of the RFC, so there may
be interactive, multimedia, or other elements that cannot be
included in SVG diagrams.
The words that confuse me here is "remain static". Is this just saying that
SVGs in RFCs must be static? For instance, is it impermissible to have
SVGs cannot have responsive design features where they resize in response
to the size of the page? Or does it just mean you can't use JS to adjust
the
SVG, despite RFC 7992 S 2 (I see below that it says that SVGs must
not contain executable script, but you could have separate JS which
manipulated the SVG).
Separately:
* Authors may include multiple versions of images or diagrams in
rfcxml. Publication formats should present the version that is
best suited to each format. In many cases, that will be an SVG.
Would it be permissible to have multiple SVGs and dynamically choose
one using JS?
-Ekr
> Nits follow:
>
> Perhaps the title should be "Scalable Vector Graphics in RFCs" ?
>
> > Abstract
> >
> > This document sets policy for the inclusion of SVGs...
>
> Suggest:
>
> This document sets policy for the inclusion of diagrams in Scalable Vector
> Graphics (SVG) format...
>
> Regards
> Brian Carpenter
>
> On 28-May-25 09:53, Pete Resnick wrote:
> > After our discussion, draft-editorial-rswg-svgsinrfcs-01 not only seems
> > ready for WG adoption, but it also seems to have cleared up all
> > outstanding issues for folks. Therefore, you're about to see two
> > messages from the tracker: Adoption of the document followed by WGLC for
> > the document. Consider this the start of a 2-week Working Group Last
> > Call for draft-editorial-rswg-svgsinrfcs-01.
> >
> > Pete
> > for the RSWG chairs
> >
>
> --
> rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
>
--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
