On Jun 4, 2025, at 00:24, Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote: >> >> Authors may include multiple versions of images or diagrams in rfcxml. >> Publication formats should present the version that is best suited to each >> format. In many cases, that will be an SVG. > > Does this cover the case where the responsive interface would indicate a dark > mode version of an SVG?
Is there is anything in any of the current RFCs that would cover that? I don't think so, but I could be wrong. If there isn't, then this SVG-specific document is certainly the wrong place to introduce it. --Paul Hoffman -- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
