I like fix #3 as well, happy to change it when we get there! Alexis On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 8:58 AM Pete Resnick <resn...@episteme.net> wrote:
> Agreed that this is editorial. Let's fix it as part of the RSAB review. > > pr > > On 16 Jun 2025, at 18:35, Rob Sayre wrote: > > Hi, > > Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@icann.org> wrote: > > When there is a reference to a web page, what is the title used in the > reference listing? > > Oh, I guess there are 3 choices here. > > Possible fix 1: > > [SVG] > W3C, "W3C SVG Working Group", n.d., > <https://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/>. > > Possible fix 2: > > [SVG] > W3C, "Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG)", n.d., > <https://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/>. > > Possible fix 3: > > [SVG] > W3C, "Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG)", n.d., > <https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/>. > > I changed the URL in one of my suggestions, now #3. This change is because > the page here: > > https://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/ > > seems unmaintained. But the W3C does have this URL: > > https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/ > > which just goes to the latest SVG spec. There are more specific ones, like: > > https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/ > https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG2/ > > So there are two choices to make for this vague, but therefore timeless, > SVG reference: > > A) Title > B) URL > > In this listing, I like fix #3, but all of them are OK. > > thanks, > Rob > > > -- > Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/ > All connections to the world are tenuous at best >
-- rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
