The clients that aren't doing a directory listing are; rsync version 2.3.1 protocol version 20 && rsync version 2.2.1 protocol version 19
The client that works as desired and expected is; rsync version 2.4.6 protocol version 24 I tried adding a trailing / but that didn't encourage the older versions to do a directory listing. Instead I got the response below; skipping directory / client: nothing to do Adding a -r did, but the recursion returns too much data to be useful. I can upgrade the older versions here but my concern and desire is to support those outside my department using older clients. I am getting the impression that those using older clients are accustomed to not seeing a directory listing. If this is true than I guess I am content with my setup. Is there is another way I can encourage a directory listing, maybe on the server side. Thanks, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 5:47 PM To: Don Fike Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: dir list behavior differences? On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 03:49:27PM -0500, Don Fike wrote: > Hello, > > I have set up an anonymous rsync server > that seems to work as expected. However > when I try to access the server from several > other unix boxes using rsync with a command > like this; > > rsync netlib3.cs.utk.edu::netlib/ > > I get the motd and then a line that states > > client: nothing to do > > Now I would expect this to give me a directory > listing. I do get the directory listing as > expected when doing the command from the local > box. I have tried other servers listed here; > > http://sunsite.dk/info/guides/rsync/rsync-mirroring03.html > > and I get the same results, when using some of my > clients I just get the motd and the client: nothing > to do error. > > Is this an issue with backwards compatibility between > new server and older client communications? > Is there a way to get the listings as expected for > all clients? You don't mention the version numbers, but I believe the issue is yes it is a matter of client version. Can you not upgrade the older clients? - Dave Dykstra