On 10/7/07, Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 01:18:46AM -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > That "fix" misses the point. > > No, it's just incomplete. Patience.
Sorry. What I meant was that, once impliedness of directories is represented properly (which is necessary to handle the most general case of --relative --no-implied-dirs), it is not clear to me how checking the relative flag would be helpful; but of course you know the code better than I do. In the future, when you make an incomplete fix, would you please indicate that you know it is incomplete? Otherwise I feel it is my duty to make sure you know, and I may come across as impatient. Matt -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
