On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:51:45PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: > what was the specific rationale for removing the condition?
I recall thinking that the condition was superfluous for most cases (due to how we cache the local permissions when preserving is off), and that I wanted to see when 'p' would pop in the output (indicating that a permission change had unexpectedly happened). Since you've shown that this can be confusing in the link-dest case, I'll change it back. > A second issue: the logic in "unchanged_attrs" needs to be extended so > that an executability difference disqualifies hard links when -E is on. Thanks, that should be fixed now. ..wayne.. -- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
