On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Jason Keltz <j...@cse.yorku.ca> wrote:

> As far as I understand, even though rsync is running on the client, the
> server is trying to write the batch file locally?
>

No, the batch file is always output by whatever side is running the rsync
command.  You either need to specify a path for the batch file (to avoid a
read-only directory), or you have your transfer reversed and you're trying
to update the wrong way.

..wayne..
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Reply via email to