On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Jason Keltz <j...@cse.yorku.ca> wrote:
> As far as I understand, even though rsync is running on the client, the > server is trying to write the batch file locally? > No, the batch file is always output by whatever side is running the rsync command. You either need to specify a path for the batch file (to avoid a read-only directory), or you have your transfer reversed and you're trying to update the wrong way. ..wayne..
-- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html