Before anything else, thanks for the bug report. I really do appreciate it.
Robin Lee Powell wrote: > You'll have to take my word for it that rsyncrypto exits at that > point. > Funny, I was certain that it's possible to test that.... > > I've got to say, between this and the delete bug (deletes with a > filemap don't actually delete anything), EncFS is looking mighty > tasty. If you send me the receipt number I'll be happy to give you a full refund. > I've tested, and rsync *does* work with it (in the sense of > saving transfer time/data). > Rsyncrypto is made for a specific purpose. that purpose is to allow you to sync (using rsync) without sharing the key. Unless I'm missing on something, EncFS does not allow you that. I should point out that if that is not what you are after, then other solutions are much more space efficient, as they do not require an extra encrypted copy. Plans for making that unnecessary are in place, but they will take some time. In other words, I'm sorry you feel unhappy with rsyncrypto. I will definitely look at those bugs when I get a chance (and sooner if you send a patch), but a simple bug report would have been just as effective, if not more. I tend to ignore people who try to employ emotional blackmail on me. > -Robin > Shachar ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Rsyncrypto-devel mailing list Rsyncrypto-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rsyncrypto-devel
