No, I mean that we define a field name, but leave it to the user if he or she adds/creates the field to the schema (actually two, one for received and one for generated).
Rainer > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Lorbach > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:48 AM > To: rsyslog-users > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp > > By not adding it into the standard schema, you mean the default table > layout for the database? > We may could reuse an existing unused field instead? > > -- > Andre > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards > > Sent: Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 10:39 > > To: rsyslog-users > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp > > > > Andre, > > > > So do you think we should add this to the standard schema? I am a bit > > hesitant, as not all folks will probably want that and it keeps > > backward > > compatibility. Maybe it is better to just us a standard name but not > > include it in the standard schema. > > > > What do you (and others) think? > > > > Rainer > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Lorbach > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:37 AM > > > To: rsyslog-users > > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp > > > > > > I think this would be possible yes, we need to define a common name > > for > > > the database and property field in rsyslog, then we can start > adding > > > support for it in phplogcon. > > > > > > regards, > > > Andre > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mikel > > > > Sent: Dienstag, 18. November 2008 21:06 > > > > To: rsyslog-users > > > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Andre > > > > > > > > So, in near future will be possible? > > > > > > > > Or in far future? > > > > > > > > Thanx > > > > > > > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:00:04 +0100, "Rainer Gerhards" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Andre and all, > > > > > > > > > > the rsyslog engine has the necessary plumbing and I know of at > > > least > > > > one > > > > > user who stores subsecond timestamps in this way. As far as > > rsyslog > > > > is > > > > > concerned, this just requires a special timestamp. So if you > > would > > > > > support that in phpLogCon (what I would find a good idea ;)), I > > > would > > > > > include a standard template into rsyslog (hardcoded). That > would > > > make > > > > it > > > > > easier for people to work with it. But maybe we get along by > just > > > > > properly documenting it, because the schema must be modified in > > any > > > > > case. > > > > > > > > > > Another alternative would be to update the default schema, but > I > > am > > > > not > > > > > sure it that is actually a good idea. On the other hand, high- > > > > precision > > > > > timestamps hopefully get into more widespread use... > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts from the community are appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Rainer > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog- > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Lorbach > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:56 PM > > > > >> To: rsyslog-users > > > > >> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp > > > > >> > > > > >> I think it wouldn't be so difficult to implement, if the > > > > milliseconds > > > > >> were simply stored in a second field. > > > > >> We can add custom new fields into phpLogCon very easily. > > > > >> > > > > >> best regards, > > > > >> Andre Lorbach > > > > >> > > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > > > >> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog- > > > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards > > > > >> > Sent: Dienstag, 18. November 2008 16:39 > > > > >> > To: rsyslog-users > > > > >> > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Hi Mikel, > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I have talked to Andre, phpLogCon's lead developer. He says > > > MySQL > > > > >> does > > > > >> > not support millisecond resolution in timestamps. So a > > > work-around > > > > >> > would > > > > >> > be to store them to another field and add this as a second > > field > > > > to > > > > >> the > > > > >> > phpLogCon view. I think it would probably smart to enable > > > > phpLogCon > > > > >> to > > > > >> > combine two such fields, but I leave this to Andre... > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Rainer > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > > > > >> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog- > > > > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikel Jimenez > > > > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:10 PM > > > > >> > > To: rsyslog-users > > > > >> > > Subject: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Hello > > > > >> > > I am using phplogcon viewer and I have loosed milliseconds > > > > >> > timestamps. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > I watched that "DATE" in mysql databases is date-time > type. > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > Does rsyslog gives the date in milliseconds? is possible > to > > > see > > > > >> this > > > > >> > > milliseconds din phplogcon? > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > -- > > > > >> > > Mikel Jimenez Fernandez > > > > >> > > Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - > > > > >> http://www.irontec.com > > > > >> > > +34 94.404.81.82 > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > > > >> > > rsyslog mailing list > > > > >> > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > > > >> > > http://www.rsyslog.com > > > > >> > _______________________________________________ > > > > >> > rsyslog mailing list > > > > >> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > > > >> > http://www.rsyslog.com > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > > >> rsyslog mailing list > > > > >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > > > >> http://www.rsyslog.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > rsyslog mailing list > > > > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > > > > http://www.rsyslog.com > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > rsyslog mailing list > > > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > > > http://www.rsyslog.com > > > _______________________________________________ > > > rsyslog mailing list > > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > > http://www.rsyslog.com > > _______________________________________________ > > rsyslog mailing list > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > http://www.rsyslog.com > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
