Andre Lorbach escribió:
> By not adding it into the standard schema, you mean the default table
> layout for the database? 
> We may could reuse an existing unused field instead?
>
> --
> Andre 
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 19. November 2008 10:39
>> To: rsyslog-users
>> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
>>
>> Andre,
>>
>> So do you think we should add this to the standard schema? I am a bit
>> hesitant, as not all folks will probably want that and it keeps
>> backward
>> compatibility. Maybe it is better to just us a standard name but not
>> include it in the standard schema.
>>
>> What do you (and others) think?
>>
>> Rainer
>>
>>     
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Lorbach
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:37 AM
>>> To: rsyslog-users
>>> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
>>>
>>> I think this would be possible yes, we need to define a common name
>>>       
>> for
>>     
>>> the database and property field in rsyslog, then we can start adding
>>> support for it in phplogcon.
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Andre
>>>
>>>       
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mikel
>>>> Sent: Dienstag, 18. November 2008 21:06
>>>> To: rsyslog-users
>>>> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dear Andre
>>>>
>>>> So, in near future will be possible?
>>>>
>>>> Or in far future?
>>>>
>>>> Thanx
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:00:04 +0100, "Rainer Gerhards"
>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Andre and all,
>>>>>
>>>>> the rsyslog engine has the necessary plumbing and I know of at
>>>>>           
>>> least
>>>       
>>>> one
>>>>         
>>>>> user who stores subsecond timestamps in this way. As far as
>>>>>           
>> rsyslog
>>     
>>>> is
>>>>         
>>>>> concerned, this just requires a special timestamp. So if you
>>>>>           
>> would
>>     
>>>>> support that in phpLogCon (what I would find a good idea ;)), I
>>>>>           
>>> would
>>>       
>>>>> include a standard template into rsyslog (hardcoded). That would
>>>>>           
>>> make
>>>       
>>>> it
>>>>         
>>>>> easier for people to work with it. But maybe we get along by
>>>>>           
> just
>   
>>>>> properly documenting it, because the schema must be modified in
>>>>>           
>> any
>>     
>>>>> case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another alternative would be to update the default schema, but I
>>>>>           
>> am
>>     
>>>> not
>>>>         
>>>>> sure it that is actually a good idea. On the other hand, high-
>>>>>           
>>>> precision
>>>>         
>>>>> timestamps hopefully get into more widespread use...
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts from the community are appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andre Lorbach
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 5:56 PM
>>>>>> To: rsyslog-users
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it wouldn't be so difficult to implement, if the
>>>>>>             
>>>> milliseconds
>>>>         
>>>>>> were simply stored in a second field.
>>>>>> We can add custom new fields into phpLogCon very easily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> best regards,
>>>>>> Andre Lorbach
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards
>>>>>>> Sent: Dienstag, 18. November 2008 16:39
>>>>>>> To: rsyslog-users
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Mikel,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have talked to Andre, phpLogCon's lead developer. He says
>>>>>>>               
>>> MySQL
>>>       
>>>>>> does
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> not support millisecond resolution in timestamps. So a
>>>>>>>               
>>> work-around
>>>       
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>> be to store them to another field and add this as a second
>>>>>>>               
>> field
>>     
>>>> to
>>>>         
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> phpLogCon view. I think it would probably smart to enable
>>>>>>>               
>>>> phpLogCon
>>>>         
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> combine two such fields, but I leave this to Andre...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:rsyslog-
>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mikel Jimenez
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 2:10 PM
>>>>>>>> To: rsyslog-users
>>>>>>>> Subject: [rsyslog] milliseconds timestamp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>> I am using phplogcon viewer and I have loosed milliseconds
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> timestamps.
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> I watched that "DATE" in mysql databases is date-time type.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does rsyslog gives the date in milliseconds? is possible to
>>>>>>>>                 
>>> see
>>>       
>>>>>> this
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> milliseconds din phplogcon?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
>>>>>>>> Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX -
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>> http://www.irontec.com
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> +34 94.404.81.82
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>>>>>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>>>>>>> http://www.rsyslog.com
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>>>>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>>>>>> http://www.rsyslog.com
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>>>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>>>>> http://www.rsyslog.com
>>>>>>             
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>>>> http://www.rsyslog.com
>>>>>           
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>>> http://www.rsyslog.com
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>> http://www.rsyslog.com
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> rsyslog mailing list
>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>> http://www.rsyslog.com
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
>   
Hello Andre/Rainer

Have do you decide how to progress with that?

Can I help

-- 
Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - http://www.irontec.com
+34 94.404.81.82


_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to