> I agree, and that is my plan. Hopefully for next week. As you have > probably > seen, I made some changes with good results, but there are correctness > issues > (e.g. I see some duplicated strings). I will now focus on getting the > code > correct again (which probably means some loss of performance) and then > I'll > dig further into that direction.
I have identified and fixed the regression. It was exactly in the area of transaction support/string generation, where I had included very poor PoC code. Not unexpectedly, that means performance and scalability will drop again considerably with this fix. But please do not be concerned about that. I now know where to look at and what to change and will do that as next things. It may just take a little more than a couple of hours ;) Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
