On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > Is exapt still alive? The homepage does not look promising...
I don't know of any new development on it, on the other hand I'm not sure what additional development would be needed. David Lang > ----- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht ----- > Von: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Juni 2010 14:48 > An: rsyslog-users <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [rsyslog] any concerns about libxml > > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > >> As a question related to the config issue: does anyone have concerns about >> the libxml library? After what I have seen, it seems to be fairly portable, >> stand-alone and widely used. But I have zero experience selecting XML >> toolkits, thus I ask... > > the gold standard in portability and speed is still expat as far as I > know. It's fallen out of favor in recent years as it really wants to > process the entire XML document in one pass (but it does have callbacks so > that it can handle learning about new tags as you go along). with > multi-meg/gig XML documents you really need to have an incramental parser, > but rsyslog shouldn't need to deal with such large entities ;-) > > David Lang > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com > _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
