Wow, Rainer, thanks for the quick response.

So on a local system some processes actually provide a high res time that 
rsyslog then logs as %timereported%. Did not realize this would be happening. I 
guess that most clients then do not provide the hi-res times and this might 
explain some messages having the time and most not:

Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10+10:00 2011-07-18T14:27:10.702529+10:00  The 
audit daemon is exiting.
Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10.703673+10:00 
2011-07-18T14:27:10.703673+10:00 audit(1310963230.693:4484770): audit_pid=0 
old=1773 by auid=4294967295
Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10.867738+10:00 
2011-07-18T14:27:10.867738+10:00 audit(1310963230.864:4484771): auid=672 
op=remove rule key=(null) list=2 res=1
Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10+10:00 2011-07-18T14:27:10.959443+10:00  
Warning - freq is non-zero and incremental flushing not selected.
Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10+10:00 2011-07-18T14:27:10.978467+10:00  
Started dispatcher: /sbin/audispd pid: 4794
Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10.981061+10:00 
2011-07-18T14:27:10.981061+10:00 audit(1310963230.979:4484772): audit_pid=4792 
old=0 by auid=672
Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10+10:00 2011-07-18T14:27:10.998047+10:00  
af_unix plugin initialized




----- Original Message -----
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rodney McKee
> > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 6:00 AM
> > To: rsyslog-users
> > Subject: [rsyslog] timereported:::date-rfc3339
> > 
> > What effects the recording of milliseconds when using
> > timereported:::date-
> > rfc3339.
> 
> This field contains what the sender told us. If the sender sent no
> ms, we can
> not report them. Rather than to pretend "x.000000" they are there, we
> do not
> give them. Note that for the same reason there may be sub-ms
> resolution, like
> us, if that is what the sender reported.
> 
> Note that starting with the latest v5-devel version AND a recent
> Linux
> kernel, we can ask the system for more precise timestamps on messages
> that
> come in via the log socket.
> 
> Rainer
> 
> > Some log entries get milliseconds and some do not:
> > The template:
> > "%TIMESTAMP% %timereported:::date-rfc3339% %timegenerated:::date-
> > rfc3339% %msg%\n"
> > 
> > The output:
> > Jul 18 13:58:30 2011-07-18T13:58:30+10:00
> > 2011-07-18T13:58:30.723250+10:00
> > test
> > 
> > Am I missing something.
> > 
> > Rgds
> > Rodney
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > http://www.rsyslog.com
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
> 
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to