The following log has a restart of auditd and a ssh connection during the debug 
run.
http://pastebin.com/cRPuA1Z8

----- Original Message -----
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rodney McKee
> > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 7:41 AM
> > To: rsyslog-users
> > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] timereported:::date-rfc3339
> > 
> > Wow, Rainer, thanks for the quick response.
> > 
> > So on a local system some processes actually provide a high res
> > time
> > that rsyslog then logs as %timereported%.
> 
> As far as the local sockets is concerned, things should be
> consistent. If
> that's not the case, it is best if you provide a debug log -- the log
> samples
> just show the result but now how we arrived there :)
> 
> Rainer
> 
> Did not realize this would be
> > happening. I guess that most clients then do not provide the hi-res
> > times and this might explain some messages having the time and most
> > not:
> > 
> > Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10+10:00 2011-07-
> > 18T14:27:10.702529+10:00  The audit daemon is exiting.
> > Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10.703673+10:00 2011-07-
> > 18T14:27:10.703673+10:00 audit(1310963230.693:4484770): audit_pid=0
> > old=1773 by auid=4294967295
> > Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10.867738+10:00 2011-07-
> > 18T14:27:10.867738+10:00 audit(1310963230.864:4484771): auid=672
> > op=remove rule key=(null) list=2 res=1
> > Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10+10:00 2011-07-
> > 18T14:27:10.959443+10:00  Warning - freq is non-zero and
> > incremental
> > flushing not selected.
> > Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10+10:00 2011-07-
> > 18T14:27:10.978467+10:00  Started dispatcher: /sbin/audispd pid:
> > 4794
> > Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10.981061+10:00 2011-07-
> > 18T14:27:10.981061+10:00 audit(1310963230.979:4484772):
> > audit_pid=4792
> > old=0 by auid=672
> > Jul 18 14:27:10 2011-07-18T14:27:10+10:00 2011-07-
> > 18T14:27:10.998047+10:00  af_unix plugin initialized
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog-
> > > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rodney McKee
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 6:00 AM
> > > > To: rsyslog-users
> > > > Subject: [rsyslog] timereported:::date-rfc3339
> > > >
> > > > What effects the recording of milliseconds when using
> > > > timereported:::date-
> > > > rfc3339.
> > >
> > > This field contains what the sender told us. If the sender sent
> > > no
> > > ms, we can
> > > not report them. Rather than to pretend "x.000000" they are
> > > there, we
> > > do not
> > > give them. Note that for the same reason there may be sub-ms
> > > resolution, like
> > > us, if that is what the sender reported.
> > >
> > > Note that starting with the latest v5-devel version AND a recent
> > > Linux
> > > kernel, we can ask the system for more precise timestamps on
> > > messages
> > > that
> > > come in via the log socket.
> > >
> > > Rainer
> > >
> > > > Some log entries get milliseconds and some do not:
> > > > The template:
> > > > "%TIMESTAMP% %timereported:::date-rfc3339%
> > > > %timegenerated:::date-
> > > > rfc3339% %msg%\n"
> > > >
> > > > The output:
> > > > Jul 18 13:58:30 2011-07-18T13:58:30+10:00
> > > > 2011-07-18T13:58:30.723250+10:00
> > > > test
> > > >
> > > > Am I missing something.
> > > >
> > > > Rgds
> > > > Rodney
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rsyslog mailing list
> > > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > > > http://www.rsyslog.com
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rsyslog mailing list
> > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > > http://www.rsyslog.com
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rsyslog mailing list
> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> > http://www.rsyslog.com
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com
> 
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com

Reply via email to