On Sun, 12 May 2013, Jerome Renard wrote:
Hi Rainer,
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Rainer Gerhards
<[email protected]> wrote:
This sounds indeed very interesting. Unfortunately, I am extremely busy
until the end of month and can have no look (we got a gouvernment grant,
but need to create some functionality until the end of month due to budget
reasons - an almost undoable task...).
Good luck.
IMHO it all depends on the effort required. Looking at the Sphinx homepage,
it looks promising too me. As Michael said, we were interested in DocBook,
but it's learning cure was way too steep and we couldn't afford all the
time required (which went along with users always prefered new features
over better doc, at least when it was a feature they needed ;)).
Docbook is super powerful but way to complex.
Since you are busy until the end of the month I propose we discuss
that topic again in June, what do you think ?
I don't think there is any opposition to this idea yet, but as people start
working with it they may run into headaches.
Just some notes on the documentation for any who don't know it.
the documentation that ships with rsyslog is intended to be basically a snapshot
of the documentation that's on the website, with the website always containing
the most current version and the version shipping with any version matching that
version.
If people want to take some time and start the conversion process, I doubt that
your work will go to waste.
I'd suggest cloning the git tree and working on the documentation there, that
way Rainer can do a pull from you when he comes up for air again.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
