On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a question > > I am going through the the stats, and there are some instances where the > action processed goes to 500,00 + does that mean that it writes out that > many messages in that second?
yup, minus a small margin for i/o in progress plus the extra vagueness you enabled by setting it to deltas. But I'd say +/-5% that's the number that goes to that file during the period. also what are the resource-usage numbers? > > actually, it would save all of us time if you would read the doc links I continously post ;) once again: http://www.rsyslog.com/rsyslog-statistic-counter/ I really have a reason point you to them ;-) Rainer > > Thu Oct 10 10:43:47 2013: action 1: processed=1400000 failed=0 > Thu Oct 10 10:43:47 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=0 > Thu Oct 10 10:43:47 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=0 > Thu Oct 10 10:43:47 2013: resource-usage: utime=127966546 stime=173249662 > maxrss=20414472 minflt=5116893 majflt=0 inblock=0 oublock=21631064 > nvcsw=4687486 nivcsw=59354 > Thu Oct 10 10:43:47 2013: main Q: size=1985593 enqueued=0 full=0 > discarded.full=0 discarded.nf=0 maxqsize=20000000 > > Thu Oct 10 10:43:48 2013: imuxsock: submitted=0 ratelimit.discarded=0 > ratelimit.numratelimiters=0 > Thu Oct 10 10:43:48 2013: action 1: processed=574000 failed=0 > Thu Oct 10 10:43:48 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=0 > Thu Oct 10 10:43:48 2013: imudp(*:514): submitted=0 > Thu Oct 10 10:43:48 2013: resource-usage: utime=131556000 stime=174801426 > maxrss=20414472 minflt=5116893 majflt=0 inblock=0 oublock=22391480 > nvcsw=4814080 nivcsw=59376 > Thu Oct 10 10:43:48 2013: main Q: size=1410593 enqueued=0 full=0 > discarded.full=0 discarded.nf=0 maxqsize=20000000 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Robert > > Sent: 10/10/13 09:46 AM > > To: Rainer Gerhards > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Tr : Re: perfomance tweaking (fwd) > > > These are the results with 1000 for both timeREquery and batchsize, writing > out to /dev/null > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Rainer Gerhards > Sent: 10/10/13 08:48 AM > To: Robert > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Tr : Re: perfomance tweaking (fwd) > > umm.. again the ML thread is broken :-( > > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Robert < [email protected] > wrote:From the > documentation does that mean that I should lessen my timeRequery and > batchSize? to something lower ? > > A relatively large batch size is a good thing. I would be conservative with > timeRequery in a large batch environment. As I wrote in the doc, I'd > recommend not to go higer than 10. > > Rainer > > Robert. > > > > > > Robert. > > > > > > > Robert. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
