the only possible use case I can think of is the 'audit grade' reliability where
you want to make sure everything is processed with no possibility for loss, and
that can be done with disk queues as well.
so I don't think it will be missed.
David Lang
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Rainer Gerhards
wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:37:37 +0100
From: Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>
Reply-To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]>
Subject: [rsyslog] do we need DIRECT mode for main queues?
Just as the subject says: do we need this?
In some engine versions this was useful to limit locking contention, but
that's not really a problem any longer. I am tempted to remove support for
it (would clean up the code).
Any thoughts?
Rainer
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
