Agreed. Would greatly reduce any confusion on 'Which is current and accurate'.
-- James -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:10 AM To: rsyslog-users Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Redhat/CentOS init/sysconfig/default config files On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Boylan, James <[email protected]>wrote: > Does it make sense to leave these files in the default Rsyslog GIT > repo or move them into the Rsyslog-pkg-redhat-centos repo? Since we > are building that repo out it makes sense that we would move these > files into it. I can push a PR to get them added, but I wanted to get > Rainer and everyone's opinion before I did so. > > ... and along these lines, I, too, think these files are redundant now. If nobody objects, I'll remove the whole ./build directory subtree (which was meant to hold these types of files). Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.

