Agreed. Would greatly reduce any confusion on 'Which is current and accurate'.

-- James


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rainer Gerhards
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 10:10 AM
To: rsyslog-users
Subject: Re: [rsyslog] Redhat/CentOS init/sysconfig/default config files

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Boylan, James <[email protected]>wrote:

> Does it make sense to leave these files in the default Rsyslog GIT 
> repo or move them into the Rsyslog-pkg-redhat-centos repo? Since we 
> are building that repo out it makes sense that we would move these 
> files into it. I can push a PR to get them added, but I wanted to get 
> Rainer and everyone's opinion before I did so.
>
>
... and along these lines, I, too, think these files are redundant now. If 
nobody objects, I'll remove the whole ./build directory subtree (which was 
meant to hold these types of files).

Rainer
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is 
a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our 
control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to