2014-02-25 16:33 GMT+01:00 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>: > Hi folks, > > as you probably know, we get a new documentation thanks to the rsyslog-doc > project. I don't want to add all files individually to rsyslog. Would the > following work for you > > a) two tarballs are being provided, one with source, one with doc > b) a single tarball is provided, but it contains the doc tarball as whole > c) anything else? > > *I* would prefer a), but not sure if that's a decent choice for other > folks. Feedback appreciated. >
I think I would prefer b), so I don't need to hunt around and get the correct version of the doc that is matching the version of rsyslog. It would make packaging a bit simpler as I don't need to maintain another source package. Splitting the doc from the source might be useful, if both project have a completely different release cycle. Say you want to release doc updates every week, but the rsyslog get's a release only every 2 months. Regarding a), you might have a look at git submodules. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
