> > > as you probably know, we get a new documentation thanks to the > > rsyslog-doc > > > project. I don't want to add all files individually to rsyslog. > > > Would the following work for you > > > > > > a) two tarballs are being provided, one with source, one with doc > > > b) a single tarball is provided, but it contains the doc tarball as > > > whole > > > c) anything else? > > > > > > *I* would prefer a), but not sure if that's a decent choice for > > > other folks. Feedback appreciated. > > > > > > > > > I think I would prefer b), so I don't need to hunt around and get the > > correct version of the doc that is matching the version of rsyslog. > > It would make packaging a bit simpler as I don't need to maintain > > another source package. > > > > > looks like it's already decided, but would still love feedback from other > package builders.
I would prefer (b) as well ;) Best regards, Andre _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
