HI all, we decided that master branch receives updates only after testbench run. How important is this to us that this branch is named "master"? I ask because almost all pull requests are done against master branch, which means I need to manually merge them to master-candidate and close the PR as "unmerged".
It would probably much more efficient to have "master" be the experimental branch, and when the testbench succeeds move it to something like "master-ok" (or so). Comments? Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
