On Tue, 16 Dec 2014, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
HI all,
we decided that master branch receives updates only after testbench run.
How important is this to us that this branch is named "master"?
not very, but that's the name that people will look for. It's fairly commonly
used in git documentation.
I ask
because almost all pull requests are done against master branch, which
means I need to manually merge them to master-candidate and close the PR as
"unmerged".
It would probably much more efficient to have "master" be the experimental
branch, and when the testbench succeeds move it to something like
"master-ok" (or so).
the thing is that the testing branch gets recreated for each run. It doesn't
have a long term history (or shouldn't), so you don't want people trying to
develop against this.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
