On Sun, 3 May 2015, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
Question to all: is this a good thing to have:
https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/pull/320
knee jerk reaction, why not...
that said, what is the difference in the resulting size with this option?
I don't think there is a problem in having it, but I also don't think that we
want to make it the default in the pre-built packages we provide.
There are going to be some distros that enable it by default to make things
smaller, and for some things, this may make a noticable difference (I'd really
like to see rsyslog in OpenWRT for example, and there things are really tight)
so there is a small negative to having the option. But I don't think that it
needs test coverage, and I think the odds of it actually causing a problem (as
opposed to making it harder to debug a problem) are very small.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
