Thx for the feedback, I've just merged the PR. Rainer
2015-05-04 3:19 GMT+02:00 David Lang <[email protected]>: > On Sun, 3 May 2015, Rainer Gerhards wrote: > >> Question to all: is this a good thing to have: >> >> https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/pull/320 > > > knee jerk reaction, why not... > > that said, what is the difference in the resulting size with this option? > > I don't think there is a problem in having it, but I also don't think that > we want to make it the default in the pre-built packages we provide. > > There are going to be some distros that enable it by default to make things > smaller, and for some things, this may make a noticable difference (I'd > really like to see rsyslog in OpenWRT for example, and there things are > really tight) so there is a small negative to having the option. But I don't > think that it needs test coverage, and I think the odds of it actually > causing a problem (as opposed to making it harder to debug a problem) are > very small. > > David Lang > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of > sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T > LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
