On Fri, 22 May 2015, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
Well, how about a "lua bridge" implementation that is contributed
functionality and not part of the regular core (so I don't need to support
or maintain it ). If it works our well, we can think of making it part of
core.
I still wonder if we *really* need a full programming language in rsyslog -
why not call an external module for exotic cases?
what would be the difference between a lua bridge and a message modification
module written in lua?
I could possibly see having an inline version of a mmmodule that shows up
entirely in the rsyslog.conf (and included files), but that the config
preprocessor extracts and runs as a scripted mm module.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
