On 23 November 2015 at 22:28, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > The main reason I see to use rfc5424 mode is that there is a lot of > software out there that truncates logs in tradtional syslog mode, but > doesn't in rfc5424 mode :-/ (and the added timestamp detail is nice)
Thank you David for all the advice and explanations. Best, Dov _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
