2015-11-24 8:01 GMT+01:00 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>: > Dov, > > could you test a fix? I am currently very busy. I could craft a patch, > but I currently have no time to actually test it.
Well, the patch is here in case you want to give it a try: https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/pull/618 Rainer > > Rainer > > 2015-11-24 5:12 GMT+01:00 Dov Murik <[email protected]>: >> On 23 November 2015 at 22:28, David Lang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The main reason I see to use rfc5424 mode is that there is a lot of >>> software out there that truncates logs in tradtional syslog mode, but >>> doesn't in rfc5424 mode :-/ (and the added timestamp detail is nice) >> >> >> >> Thank you David for all the advice and explanations. >> >> Best, >> Dov >> _______________________________________________ >> rsyslog mailing list >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog >> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ >> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards >> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of >> sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T >> LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
