2016-03-02 16:51 GMT+01:00 Peter Portante <[email protected]>:
> And it appears to also affect the "$date-ordinal" property.  Can you
> confirm?

Yeah, right because it uses the same helper function. But so the same
fix fixes that issue as well. But... having said that, it's probably
better to add some tests for it to the testbench as well.

Thanks for bringing it up.

Rainer
>
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Peter Portante <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rainer,
>>
>> Does this also affect ommongodb use?
>>
>> -peter
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I just wanted to let you know that we have found an issue with the
>>> unixtimestamp formatting option in leap years. The problem started on
>>> March, 1st and will persist till the end of the year. The timestamp is
>>> one day in the past.
>>>
>>> A patch is available here, it shall probably work with almost all
>>> rsyslog versions:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/rgerhards/rsyslog/commit/ffb321f1698a971e0acda48cafa97bb344cf0829
>>>
>>> Full details can be found in this issue tracker:
>>>    https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/issues/830
>>>
>>> Note that I will NOT release a 8.16.1 version for this fix. Usually, I
>>> would have done so, but the 8.17.0 release is due next Tuesday and
>>> will probably available as RC on friday. Given the fact that I would
>>> need at least one additional day to craft 8.16.1, I don't think this
>>> makes much sense.
>>>
>>> Distro packages (and other users as well, of course) can apply
>>> above-mentioned short patch. I actually suggest to do so, as this
>>> problem exists, I think, in all versions supporting the
>>> "unixtimestamp" formatting option (side-note: v5.8 does not have this
>>> option).
>>>
>>> Rainer
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
>>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
>>> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
> sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T 
> LIKE THAT.
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to