What's the actual issue? Sent from phone, thus brief. Am 14.03.2016 15:25 schrieb "Joe Blow" <[email protected]>:
> Any idea if this is a branch issue or what might have actually broken? I'm > trying to keep all of our systems on the latest stable release so i've been > yum updating from the stable repo instead of compiling things. > > I was autocorrected to "cents 6". I'm really using the CentOS 6 rsyslog 8 > stable repo for everything. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks in advance. > > Cheers, > > JB > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Joe Blow <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I was using cents 6 with the rsyslog 8 stable repos and it broke. > > > > Is centos delivered differently than rhel? > > > > > > > > Original Message > > From:[email protected] > > Sent:March 11, 2016 1:59 PM > > To:[email protected]; [email protected] > > Reply-to:[email protected] > > Subject:Re: [rsyslog] problem with leap year and unixtimestamp template > > option > > > > resending as the list bounced things from my new mailserver. > > > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, David Lang wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 20:52:15 -0800 (PST) > > > From: David Lang <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected], rsyslog-users <[email protected]> > > > Subject: Re: [rsyslog] problem with leap year and unixtimestamp > template > > > option > > > > > > Speaking of liblognorm, any idea when 2.0 packages will be available? > > > > > > David Lang > > > > > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016, Andre Lorbach wrote: > > > > > >> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:42:59 +0100 > > >> From: Andre Lorbach <[email protected]> > > >> To: rsyslog-users <[email protected]> > > >> Subject: Re: [rsyslog] problem with leap year and unixtimestamp > template > > >> option > > >> > > >> Which Version of liblognorm is installed? > > >> For rsyslog 8.17 we need newer version V1.1.3. > > >> > > >> Packages for Ubuntu, Redhat and Debian are up to date in our > > repositories. > > >> > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> Andre Lorbach > > >> > > >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > >>> Von: [email protected] [mailto:rsyslog- > > >>> [email protected]] Im Auftrag von Rainer Gerhards > > >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. März 2016 23:02 > > >>> An: rsyslog-users > > >>> Betreff: Re: [rsyslog] problem with leap year and unixtimestamp > > template > > >>> option > > >>> > > >>> This looks like a too old version of liblognorm. I need to check with > > >> the > > >>> package guys why this is not automatically updated. Andre? Florian? > > >>> > > >>> Rainer > > >>> > > >>> Sent from phone, thus brief. > > >>> Am 09.03.2016 19:33 schrieb "Joe Blow" <[email protected]>: > > >>> > > >>> > Hey all, > > >>> > > > >>> > After the update to 8.17 to fix this, i'm now getting this when > > >>> > mmnormalize > > >>> > loads: > > >>> > > > >>> > rsyslogd-2066: could not load module > '/lib64/rsyslog/mmnormalize.so', > > >>> > dlopen: /lib64/rsyslog/mmnormalize.so: undefined symbol: > > >>> > ln_setErrMsgCB > > >>> > [v8.17.0 try http://www.rsyslog.com/e/2066 ] > > >>> > > > >>> > Any fix? This basically broke our elasticsearch parsing. > > >>> > > > >>> > Thanks in advance. > > >>> > > > >>> > Cheers, > > >>> > > > >>> > JB > > >>> > > > >>> > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Rainer Gerhards > > >>> > <[email protected] > > >>> > > > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > > 2016-03-02 16:51 GMT+01:00 Peter Portante > > >>> <[email protected]>: > > >>> > > > And it appears to also affect the "$date-ordinal" property. > Can > > >>> > > > you confirm? > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Yeah, right because it uses the same helper function. But so the > > >>> > > same fix fixes that issue as well. But... having said that, it's > > >>> > > probably better to add some tests for it to the testbench as > well. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Thanks for bringing it up. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Rainer > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Peter Portante < > > >>> > > [email protected]> > > >>> > > > wrote: > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >> Hi Rainer, > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> Does this also affect ommongodb use? > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> -peter > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Rainer Gerhards < > > >>> > > [email protected]> > > >>> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> Hi all, > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I just wanted to let you know that we have found an issue > with > > >>> > > >>> the unixtimestamp formatting option in leap years. The > problem > > >>> > > >>> started on March, 1st and will persist till the end of the > > year. > > >>> > > >>> The timestamp > > >>> > is > > >>> > > >>> one day in the past. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> A patch is available here, it shall probably work with almost > > >>> > > >>> all rsyslog versions: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > https://github.com/rgerhards/rsyslog/commit/ffb321f1698a971e0acda48caf > > >>> > a97bb344cf0829 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Full details can be found in this issue tracker: > > >>> > > >>> https://github.com/rsyslog/rsyslog/issues/830 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Note that I will NOT release a 8.16.1 version for this fix. > > >>> > > >>> Usually, > > >>> > I > > >>> > > >>> would have done so, but the 8.17.0 release is due next > Tuesday > > >>> > > >>> and will probably available as RC on friday. Given the fact > > that > > >>> > > >>> I would need at least one additional day to craft 8.16.1, I > > >>> > > >>> don't think this makes much sense. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Distro packages (and other users as well, of course) can > apply > > >>> > > >>> above-mentioned short patch. I actually suggest to do so, as > > >>> > > >>> this problem exists, I think, in all versions supporting the > > >>> > > >>> "unixtimestamp" formatting option (side-note: v5.8 does not > > have > > >>> > > >>> this option). > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Rainer > > >>> > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> > > >>> rsyslog mailing list > > >>> > > >>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > >>> > > >>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > >>> > > >>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > > >>> > > >>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED > by > > >>> > > >>> a > > >>> > > myriad > > >>> > > >>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT > POST > > >>> > > >>> if > > >>> > you > > >>> > > >>> DON'T LIKE THAT. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > _______________________________________________ > > >>> > > > rsyslog mailing list > > >>> > > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > >>> > > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > >>> > > > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > > NOTE > > >>> > > > WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a > > >>> > myriad > > >>> > > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST > if > > >>> > > you DON'T LIKE THAT. > > >>> > > _______________________________________________ > > >>> > > rsyslog mailing list > > >>> > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > >>> > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > >>> > > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE > > >>> > > WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a > myriad > > >>> > > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST > if > > >>> > > you DON'T LIKE THAT. > > >>> > > > > >>> > _______________________________________________ > > >>> > rsyslog mailing list > > >>> > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > >>> > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > >>> > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE > > >>> > WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > > of > > >>> > sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > > >>> > DON'T LIKE THAT. > > >>> > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > >>> rsyslog mailing list > > >>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > >>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > >>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE > > WELL: > > >>> This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of > sites > > >> beyond > > >>> our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE > THAT. > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> rsyslog mailing list > > >> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > >> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > >> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > > >> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a > > myriad of > > >> sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > > DON'T > > >> LIKE THAT. > > _______________________________________________ > > rsyslog mailing list > > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > > DON'T LIKE THAT. > > > _______________________________________________ > rsyslog mailing list > http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog > http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ > What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards > NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad > of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you > DON'T LIKE THAT. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
