Hi, This question was already asked in the past, see: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.rsyslog/9864
But IMHO the answers given weren't satisfactory. So I'm asking again. If there's no reason and rsyslog only needs the local fs to be settled then it should be started earlier to avoid missing some early messages sent by systemd. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://rsyslog-users.1305293.n2.nabble.com/Does-rsyslog-really-need-to-start-after-basic-target-on-systemd-tp7590419.html Sent from the rsyslog-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
