On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, mosto...@gmail.com wrote:
not really, but we haven't had anyone experiment with thousands of them, so
it's possible, but unlikely that there would be a measureable slowdown as
rsyslog finds the right one to use.
The bigger overhead is in interpreting the template, that's where
simplifying it to be $! or $!foo would be a big win (or writing a string
module)
Memory went above 5GB for our first dirty try (several rulesets, several
queues...). I'll change that soon.
probably all the queues.
David Lang
kk
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE
THAT.
