On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, [email protected] wrote:
Older/Compact doesn't seem to have an alternative, reason why I started using JSON syntax...right?{"type":"@apache" name="."} ?actuall, %{"type":"@apache" name="."}%This is one of the places where I like to use the older, more compact syntax :-)
but just because you use json for one section, it doesn't mean you have to use json for everything.
use what makes the most sense for the portion you are working on. David Lang _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
