> On Mar 13, 2018, at 11:15, deoren > <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is an untested solution using the "advanced" format:
Oh my, that is fascinating,. I hadn't come across the advanced format yet, but that does look like it's a lot more readable, at least. I will definitely give that a shot, but I am going to have to grok it a little bit better before I do. Quick follow up on the old format: ftp.info;ftp.warn Does that exclude ONLY warnings, or warnings and higher (lower numeric code)? -- My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
