> On Mar 13, 2018, at 11:15, deoren
> <rsyslog-users-lists.adiscon....@whyaskwhy.org> wrote:
> Here is an untested solution using the "advanced" format:
Oh my, that is fascinating,. I hadn't come across the advanced format yet, but
that does look like it's a lot more readable, at least. I will definitely give
that a shot, but I am going to have to grok it a little bit better before I do.
Quick follow up on the old format:
Does that exclude ONLY warnings, or warnings and higher (lower numeric code)?
My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to
reject even more mail. I'm up to about 97% now.
rsyslog mailing list
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE