Cmake Sounds nice, but ... Even more to do ;-) Sent from phone, thus brief.
Derek DiFilippo <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., 5. März 2019, 21:15: > Thanks for the clarification. > > We've invested a lot of time/effort into CMake. We do everything via > CMake/CTest/CPack & are generating .rpms and .debs. > It's a steep climb because we had legacy repos to convert, and it's hard > work in general. It's been worth it though. > > best, > -Derek. > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 11:39 AM Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Simple: Lack of contributors. I am asking since years for folks who would >> like to help with packaging and so far we had 0 responses. Adiscon packages >> what the support customers request. But that's basically it. >> >> I have started with suse obs one or two years ago, so that we get Debian >> and suse as well. But it's a real side activity, and so far nobody who >> knows the system did step in when I asked. Thankfully Jan has packaged >> omhttp for what we have on obs and where we can make it work. Right now, >> though, the build on my repo send to but have worked. Hopefully fixed soon. >> >> Rainer >> >> Sent from phone, thus brief. >> >> Derek DiFilippo via rsyslog <[email protected]> schrieb am Di., >> 5. März 2019, 20:08: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> Congrats to Rainer and the team for another great release. >>> >>> Why was omhttp.so not built/packaged with 8.1903 (or 8.1901 for that >>> matter)? >>> >>> What is the best practice here if I need to use and distribute omhttp? >>> >>> Build and install it myself into /usr/lib64/rsyslog? I'm wary of doing >>> that >>> because it might conflict with a future rsyslog update. >>> >>> I feel there's a policy/convention I'm missing here. Why not build and >>> package all modules? Package size? Licensing? Is the concept that people >>> might build/package/install their own custom modules? Wouldn't they be >>> free >>> to name the .so differently and then something like >>> module(load="mycustomomhttp")? >>> >>> thanks, >>> -Derek. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rsyslog mailing list >>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog >>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ >>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards >>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad >>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you >>> DON'T LIKE THAT. >>> >> _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
