On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, Jonathan Mills wrote: > Yes, I've read of that solution also. However, ... to do each time > ... will fail ...
I second that, having seen lots of these in the years we use RT. (Even if 'we' normally have some 'Bounce'-Method, it sometimes fails). AND just by coincidence I aM searching for the same(!?) Solution for another Problem! IF somebody creates a kind of 'umbrella list' for errors/support-calls, and one of the recipients is a RT-queue, then this queue - must not reply to the list (else we get loops) - does not use (know?) the real sender for the requestor, but uses the liSts sender/reply-to address. The latter is the same problem as 'forwarded' in this thread. Only there never can be anybody, to fix it by explicitely setting some Adresses -- the only way would be a 'scrip' or 'Filter' to switch from (whateber RT does now) to preferring/accepting the ORIGINAL 'From: address' Header. Did somebody see such a fix? Thanks, Stucki -- Christoph von Stuckrad * * |nickname |Mail <[email protected]> \ Freie Universitaet Berlin |/_*|'stucki' |Tel(Mo.,Mi.):+49 30 838-75 459| Mathematik & Informatik EDV |\ *|if online| (Di,Do,Fr):+49 30 77 39 6600| Takustr. 9 / 14195 Berlin * * |on IRCnet|Fax(home): +49 30 77 39 6601/ -------- We're hiring! http://bestpractical.com/jobs
