Hello,
Please suggest modifications if required in arm csb336 and arm csb337 patch
that I submitted, so that I can move things to a fast track. I really need to
perfect these first patches, in order to know that the code that I'm updating
is being done in the right way or not.
commit 6130c92254089c412ea9f135503901f898fc0fc1
Author: Vipul Nayyar <nayyar_vi...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue Jul 2 11:58:09 2013 +0530
Updated Legacy code in arm csb337
diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/csb337/network/network.c
b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/csb337/network/network.c
index e31bcc0..3a02073 100644
--- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/csb337/network/network.c
+++ b/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/csb337/network/network.c
@@ -358,6 +358,7 @@ void at91rm9200_emac_init(void *arg)
{
at91rm9200_emac_softc_t *sc = arg;
struct ifnet *ifp = &sc->arpcom.ac_if;
+ rtems_status_code sc = RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL;
/*
*This is for stuff that only gets done once (at91rm9200_emac_init()
@@ -382,7 +383,16 @@ void at91rm9200_emac_init(void *arg)
AIC_SMR_REG(AIC_SMR_EMAC) = AIC_SMR_PRIOR(EMAC_INT_PRIORITY);
/* install the interrupt handler */
- BSP_install_rtems_irq_handler(&at91rm9200_emac_isr_data);
+ sc = rtems_interrupt_handler_install(
+ at91rm9200_emac_isr_data.name,
+ "Network",
+ RTEMS_INTERRUPT_UNIQUE,
+ at91rm9200_emac_isr_data.hdl,
+ at91rm9200_emac_isr_data.handle
+ );
+ if (sc != RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL) {
+ return 0;
+ }
/* EMAC doesn't support promiscuous, so ignore requests */
if (ifp->if_flags & IFF_PROMISC) {
Regards
Vipul Nayyar
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
