Hello Vipul Nayyar,
I have weak appeal to not remove rtems_irq_hdl_param
definition from RTEMS headers. It would cause problems
for code which needs to be compatible with more RTEMS
versions.
As for users/functions prototypes, I am not sure, conversion
to (void * ) is OK with me, but on the other hand
rtems_irq_hdl_param documents what is that parameter
and where its value originates.
Best wishes,
Pavel Pisa
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
