Hello Pavel,
On 2013-07-25 14:14, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Vipul Nayyar,
I have weak appeal to not remove rtems_irq_hdl_param
definition from RTEMS headers. It would cause problems
for code which needs to be compatible with more RTEMS
versions.
we want to remove the legacy interrupt API only from the RTEMS sources.
Applications can still use it.
As for users/functions prototypes, I am not sure, conversion
to (void * ) is OK with me, but on the other hand
rtems_irq_hdl_param documents what is that parameter
and where its value originates.
Ok, this is a valid point. We can add a typedef to the IRQ extensions API if
there is a desire for this.
http://www.rtems.org/onlinedocs/doxygen/cpukit/html/group__rtems__interrupt__extension.html#gafc892e6717ccfe939498305dc8ee29f4
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
