On 10/14/2013 09:09 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 2013-10-11 19:54, Gedare Bloom wrote: >> I would like to make one other suggestion, which is: >> RTEMS_PARAVIRT, and --enable-paravirt. >> This option is consistent with the language already used to describe >> what is being done, i.e. paravirtualization of some pieces of RTEMS. >> All in favor? > > This is fine for me. >
+1 _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
