Yes I'll implement this and send a patch in the next weeks. On 10/14/2013 05:24 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > OK. Philipp can you send a patch when you are able that adds the new flag? > -Gedare > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Philipp Eppelt > <philipp.epp...@mailbox.tu-dresden.de> wrote: >> On 10/14/2013 09:09 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 2013-10-11 19:54, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>>> I would like to make one other suggestion, which is: >>>> RTEMS_PARAVIRT, and --enable-paravirt. >>>> This option is consistent with the language already used to describe >>>> what is being done, i.e. paravirtualization of some pieces of RTEMS. >>>> All in favor? >>> >>> This is fine for me. >>> >> >> +1 >> _______________________________________________ >> rtems-devel mailing list >> rtems-devel@rtems.org >> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
_______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
