On 2014-02-21 16:16, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Feb 21, 2014 9:04 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>
wrote:
>
> On 2014-02-21 15:27, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Sebastian Huber
> > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> >> >On 2014-02-20 21:07, Jennifer Averett wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>+#if __RTEMS_HAVE_SYS_CPUSET_H__ && defined( RTEMS_SMP )
> >>> >>+const Cpuset_Control *_Cpuset_Handler_default(void);
> >>> >>+#else
> >>> >>+#define _Cpuset_Handler_default() do { } while ( 0 )
> >>> >>+#endif
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >In case the C library doesn't provide an appropriate <sys/cpuset.h> then
we
> >> >should provide our own header file. Maybe we should use a special header
> >> >file that either uses <sys/cpuset.h> directly or alternatively provides
the
> >> >missing declarations and functions.
> >> >
> >> >I don't think it makes sense to use a SMP configuration with this API.
> >> >
> > Do you mean UP?
> >
>
> Oh, I meant:
>
> I don't think it makes sense to use a SMP configuration WITHOUT this API.
Agreed and it only is there to prevent a tool versioning hiccup.
There are not that many RTEMS SMP users out there. The RTEMS SMP is work in
progress, so I don't think its too much to ask SMP interested users to use
Newlib 2.1.0. They need also <stdatomic.h>, the __getreent() stuff and the
pthread cleanup changes.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
