On 2014-02-21 15:27, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:00 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>On 2014-02-20 21:07, Jennifer Averett wrote:
>>
>>+#if __RTEMS_HAVE_SYS_CPUSET_H__ && defined( RTEMS_SMP )
>>+const Cpuset_Control *_Cpuset_Handler_default(void);
>>+#else
>>+#define _Cpuset_Handler_default() do { } while ( 0 )
>>+#endif
>
>
>In case the C library doesn't provide an appropriate <sys/cpuset.h> then we
>should provide our own header file. Maybe we should use a special header
>file that either uses <sys/cpuset.h> directly or alternatively provides the
>missing declarations and functions.
>
>I don't think it makes sense to use a SMP configuration with this API.
>
Do you mean UP?
Oh, I meant:
I don't think it makes sense to use a SMP configuration WITHOUT this API.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
rtems-devel mailing list
rtems-devel@rtems.org
http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
