On 4/23/2014 11:02 AM, Christian Svensson wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Hesham Moustafa > <heshamelmat...@gmail.com <mailto:heshamelmat...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Yes it's. Hope that gcc and gdb come next (soon). > > > That will take some time I'm afraid. Hopefully during the summer. > GDB is kind of broken/undecided, so that would need to be cleaned up. > Is gcc close then?
>From a very practical viewpoint, the only requirement to porting RTEMS is a functional gdb for the target. The target name and cleanliness isn't that important. OTOH, there will be rtems tweaks to gcc to add the or1k-rtems target. So it is more critical to get merged. -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
