On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com> wrote: > Is gcc close then? Close to merging - not really. There is interest and momentum but the effort hasn't begun. Close to being fully functional - I would say so, bugs are rare and it's only now when I'm porting the whole Debian distribution we discover some obscure bugs.
> From a very practical viewpoint, the only requirement to porting > RTEMS is a functional gdb for the target. The target name and > cleanliness isn't that important. Bare metal GDB should be available as far as I understand. > OTOH, there will be rtems tweaks to gcc to add the or1k-rtems target. > So it is more critical to get merged. Worst case, we do track our own GCC called or1k-gcc, so merging with that will ensure that it will be upstreamed in the future. _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
