http://www.al.com/printer/printer.ssf?/base/sports/1077877308315970.xml

Affidavit: Analyst wanted revenge

02/27/04
DOUG SEGREST
News staff writer

An affidavit taken in a defamation and libel case against the NCAA alleges a 
recruiting analyst conspired to damage the Alabama football program out of vengeance.

The affidavit is part of pre-trial discovery by attorney Thomas Gallion, who 
represents former Crimson Tide assistant coaches Ronnie Cottrell and Ivy Williams in a 
civil suit against the NCAA.

The source of the affidavit, Clark Charles Branch, is a former work associate of Tom 
Culpepper, a local recruiting analyst. Culpepper was identified in court documents as 
a secret witness in the NCAA's investigation of Crimson Tide recruiting.

That investigation landed Alabama on probation in 2002 and cost the school 21 
scholarships and two potential postseason appearances.

In the affidavit, Branch said Culpepper expressed contempt for former Alabama 
recruiting coordinator Cottrell and Memphis booster Logan Young. Culpepper blamed 
Young's influence for the loss of his job as a television analyst for a now-defunct 
Birmingham-based cable sports station.

Branch said that on at least six occasions in 2001, he heard Culpepper say "I'll do 
whatever it takes" to see Cottrell and Young fall as a result of the NCAA 
investigation.

The affidavit said Culpepper worked in concert with Rich Johanningmeier, the NCAA 
enforcement representative who investigated Alabama. At one point, Culpepper told 
Branch he and Johanningmeier were worried that the case against Alabama would unravel 
unless someone went on the record.

Branch said Culpepper claimed he encouraged Memphis high school coach Milton Kirk to 
go public with allegations of wrongdoing against Alabama. Kirk was an assistant coach 
during Alabama's recruitment of Memphis blue-chip prospect Albert Means, a player the 
NCAA said signed with Alabama only after Young paid $115,000.

Branch said he believed Culpepper had inside information from the NCAA because he 
accurately predicted Alabama would be punished severely by the NCAA even before the 
case reached its conclusion.

Culpepper, a Shelby County resident, said Thursday that he could not respond to the 
allegations due to a standing protective order barring comment in the suit brought 
against the NCAA by Cottrell and Williams.

Culpepper is included as a defendant in the suit. Both Cottrell and Williams claim 
they have not been able to get Division I-A jobs since leaving Alabama because of the 
damage inflicted on them by the NCAA's investigation.

A recent published transcript of Alabama's appearance before the NCAA Committee on 
Infractions showed both Cottrell and Williams were discussed at the November 2001 
hearing.

NCAA spokesman Wally Renfro said he would not rehash the transcript. But Renfro, who 
serves as NCAA President Myles Brand's senior adviser, said the NCAA's treatment of 
the two coaches is obvious in the transcript.

"Ivy Williams wasn't alluded to in terms of any allegations," Renfro said. "All but 
one of the allegations against Ronnie Cot trell were self-reported by the institution, 
not the NCAA, and were ones he acknowledged."

Renfro noted that an NCAA charge of unethical behavior against Cottrell was argued and 
eventually dismissed.

"I think you can make a strong argument that publishing the transcript does far more 
damage to their (Cottrell and Williams') case than ours," Renfro said.

Renfro will represent the NCAA in a panel discussion Sunday morning when ESPN 
broadcasts an "Outside the Lines" episode that explores the rift between Alabama and 
Tennessee over the NCAA investigation. 


______________________________________________________
RollTideFan - The University of Alabama Athletics Discussion List

"Welcome to RollTideFan! Wear a cup!"

To join or leave the list or to make changes to your subscription visit 
http://listinfo.rolltidefan.net

Reply via email to